Introduction
This site is being created to help me influence journalists in Sweden (and possibly elsewhere)
to learn more about Non-consensual Human Experimentation and the context in
which it occurs.
Even though I may be motivated to some extent, by my selfinterest, being a mind-control
victim since 1992, I am certain that the problems are of general importance
and I hope the effort will lead to a much deepened study and understanding of the post-war
period among the educated public and the policy-makers.
I beleive such a deepend understanding may be necessary to preserve democracy at all.
Partly, the problem arises because there are now high-tech methods and equipment for very
effectively repressing people with a high degree of deniability. The high technology involved is
classified and has not been officially admitted to exist or to be used against the people.
(As the truth about this high technology becomes more widely known, it will perhaps be less
likely that they use it in the abusive manner which is reflected in the accounts of some of the
mind-control victims.)
There is an important general problem with this kind of secrecy. The military use the excuse of
national security to classify research results, meaning that there is a growing knowledge gap
between the military/intelligence community and the civilian sector. Since it turns out that they
have been tempted to play god, using their superior technology, and that they have been abusing
people without any good reason, it seems relevant to ask what will happen as this knowledge gap
continues to grow. What will they do to us when they have come to have in their possession secret
computers and programs, more advanced than anything in existence today, which effectively makes
them as superior to the civilians as if they had belonged to a different species?
The secret technology used to electronically influence peoples brains from a distance, is so advanced
that it can undoubtedly be used as an important tool in connection with the legitimate parts of
medical science. This is a good argument for demanding a knowledge transfer from the military to
the civilian sector. It would probably lead to economical growth as well, but that is not my main
concern here.
People who have been abused by their authorities certainly deserve to be empathically treated by
the media, but appart from that, there is also a need for simply conveying the facts, without
moralizing and judging too much. The problem under consideration is an important untold part of
post-war history and a greater historical awareness may be the best cure against totalitarian
tendencies.
Non-consensual Human Experimentation
updated 2001-05-13
The document also contains information about activism against mind control.
Link to the paragraph about
Resisting the Mind Control State by Allen Barker
My own experience of Mind Control and surveillance
The Science of Coercion
2002-06-27
An interview with the author of the book, Christopher Simpson from 1997.
Transcript from the soundfiles FTR-78a and b in David Emory's
For The Record series
|
Quoting:
Psychological warfare first entered the english language as a translation,
a mutation of a nazi german concept called Weltanshaungskrieg
which means world view warfare and during WWII
the americans built on that and expanded it and used it
to mean a whole range of wartime type tactics involving propaganda,
dirty tricks, covert operations, whatever, to carry out a war.
Where it emerges into a modern reality came in the wake of the war when more so called
peace time types of essentially the same tactics emerged. For years now the government
has told us that we're living in the world of no war no peace and what that has meant
as a practical matter is that we're living in a world of ongoing low-level warfare and
one of the early terms that was used to describe this is psychological warfare.
Nowadays they call it lowintensity warfare.
Sometimes its called more politely 'public diplomacy'.
Just to build on that point for a minute.
When you hear people talk about lowintensity warfare,
it simply means lowintensity compared to nuclear weapons.
Lowintensity warfare from the standpoint of people who are subjected to it is
quite high intensity thank you very much! Some people would refer to it as
total warfare conducted at the grass roots level. Its basically a form of terror.
Against union organizers, I am talking about central america now,
church people, community activists of whatever sort.
- - -
...in fact from its inception from its earliest definition in classified government records,
psychological warfare is defined to include assassinations, covert operations, gerilla warfare,
counterinsurgency etc. From its inception psychological warfare has been the mating of
violence on the one hand and what people would call today propaganda or mass communication on the other hand.
Another thing that's interesting about psychological warfare, from its inception it has also
targeted the people of the united states, the common preconception is that for better or for worse
this is something we do to them. The reality is that from the governments standpoint,
from the standpoint of those who are paying the bills for its development
the targets always involve not only foreign audiences but domestic audiences as well.
|
The Mind Manipulators
2002-07-12
From 1978. By Alan W. Scheflin,
(professor of Law at the University of California),
Edward M. Opton, Jr., and co-author Rodney Plotnick,
(professor at the University of California Medical School)
The Mind Stealers
2002-07-13
From 1978. By Samuel Chavkin, co-founder and for eighteen years
editorial Director of the Science and Medicine Publishing Company,
which published newspapers in different medical disciplines for the practising,
physician. Knowing what was best about American medicine,
he was also acutely aware of some dangerous trends.
Signs of a setup?
updated 2001-05-27
I speculate that last year the two most outspoken human rights activists
in sweden were deliberately set up by the swedish authorities.
Dark clouds over swedish television
2001-04-28
Mind Control: explanation of the term
...<=...Preliminary version
The way I conceive of a modern brain implant device
updated 2001-04-13
Estimates of the range of a brain computer system
2001-04-15
This document is a bit technical and is meant to be read in connection with part 3 of The way I conceive of a modern brain implant device.
Apart from the technicalities, there are also some tentative explanations of the
bizarre round the clock surveillance experiences reported by some mc-victims.
In and among the vertebral disks?
2002-01-04
In addition to the discussions about range estimates in the link just above,
we will continue making some more estimates and make the point that the region near the so
called dorsal nerve roots, emerging among the vertebral discs is naturally suited for mounting
miniature electrodes connecting the nervous system to microchips for radio communication to remote
computers.
This placement, however, is probably not capable of expaining all types
of symptoms, and a direct mounting inside the skull is likely to be needed to produce
some types of reported effects.
The document turned out to have a different main emphasis than indicated above. Electrosex applications are discussed and
I am trying to figure out why there has been such a long delay in the application of cybernetics to prosthesis
methods.
Energikällor, antenner
och radiokommunikation
2003-02-09
Document in swedish about energy sources
with very long life length,
data applicable to inplanted
transponder antennas and
frequency allocations from
1981 perhaps indicating such uses.
A Method for the Remote Control of Electrical Stimulation
of the Nervous System
by E. Leon Chaffee and Richard U. Light,
2002-07-10
An extract from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, October 1934.
Experiments on dogs and monkeys implanted with a, technically speaking, simple induction coil
connected to an electrode. Electromagnetic frequency ca 5 KHz and power 500 kW(!)
is used to connect to the implant.
The Central Nervous System 2001-12-21
Reproductions of a few pages from this neurology textbook illustrating the connection between
regions of the body sensed and controlled by corresponding parts of the central nervous system.
Extract from The Central Nervous System, Structure and Function, 2nd ed 1998 by Per Brodal,
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo.
(The illustrations take some time to download)
Brain Function and Blood Flow
2002-03-30
by Niels A. Lassen, David H. Ingvar and Erik Skinhøj
Extract from Scientific American, October 1978, p 50-59
Brain mapping of the superficial part of the cerebral cortex with a resolution of 1 cm2
for several 100 patients by monitoring changes in blood flow.
Explanation in swedish of the term
Brain mapping
2002-03-30
quoted from Hjärnans futurum, 2001, by David H. Ingvar
Electrical equivalent circuit for myelinated nerve fibers
by J. Murdoch Ritchie
2001-12-31
Gives an idea of the high impedance conditions applicable to microelectrode connections
Understanding the nervous system
An engineering perspective, 1993 by Sid Deutsch and Alice Deutsch
2002-02-16
The title of the book is revealing and it is the kind of information an engineer, who has no access to classified information, will be looking for when contemplating the basic electronic aspects connected with cybernetic applications.
Implants vs Microwaves
updated 2000-08-07
Illusionists do it all the time
2002-07-10
A propos the preceding link, an example is given,
of what in my view is misleading information. It is an extract from the article
The Mind Fields in OMNI 2/1985
Get moving, Lazarus
updated 2000-09-28
Woodpecker
2001-06-16
I am discussing the high powered so called wood pecker
signals on the short wave band.
Cybernetics etc
2001-08-10
I intend to group together material relating to cybernetic systems.
References - 1
updated 2001-05-13
References - 2
updated 2000-11-24
Speculations
updated 2000-10-08
speculations regarding military experiments
Message to all trained professionals ..- to every breed of educated people
Futures
Arguments for an ambitious space exploration program
..
written 2000-02-05, enabled 2000-05-09
This document was held back to avoid redirecting attention from the other issues of more
immediate importance. The idea put forward is basically that one should strive to accomplish a migration
from the worlds military scientific establishments of scientists and key military and intelligence
personnel to an international cooperation consisting in an ambitious space exploration program.
It should be made up in such a way that it would pose the kind of worthy challenge necessary to attract the best
minds and the most competitive people from the mentioned groups of people. This way the new international
cooperation would have the people it needs to be able to compete successfully for the resources with the remaining
military systems and
therefore there would be an incentive for really bringing down the tensions among nations.
These tensions would be seen as the waste they really are and not as a prerequisite to be able to keep up
the huge military-industrial complex. The new international cooperation would instead build a more civilian type
of high-tech industrial complex where science would be an essentially open activity and not something hidden
in classified projects.
Start page
Diverse topics
Academia is silent on imperialism... by John Pilger
2001-04-30
Former Bush Assistant Secretary for HUD,Catherine Austin Fitts
Reveals "Ethnic Cleansing" 2001-04-30
From Mike Rupperts From The Wilderness may 1999 issue
Coverup in the Baltic sea?
update 2001-01-18
EU manoeuvering
2000-10-20
Spectacular aspects of neuroelectronics
2000-09-01
Blind chance or something more?
2002-04-12
About the lack of quantitative evidence backing the theory of evolution.
Vitalism
2000-09-06
Vitalism - 2
2000-09-12
Vitalism - 3
2001-01-04
God
2000-09-12
Astrology
2001-05-29
A teaser
The nearness of the remote
2000-09-17
Theoretical ideas connected with reccurrence in most fundamental
models of the world, and the possible importance of vanishingly small probabilities.
Limited power
2000-09-19
Centre mass etc
2000-09-?
Speculations in Astrophysics
Software Piracy
|